Free Speech vs Tate

Truth vs Tate

Andrew and Tristan Tate are suing us.
We will not be silenced.

🙏 Donate via GiveSendGo Secure donation platform

They are suing us because we spoke out. Some of us are parents. Some are survivors of abuse. Some are citizen journalists.

We shared court records, alleged victim and witness statements from criminal cases, publicly available videos, and social media posts created by the Tates, along with our opinions and commentary.

Now they’re suing us for defamation and civil conspiracy. We believe this lawsuit is meant to silence us, intimidate those who speak out, and force anonymous critics to give up their right to remain private.

Everything we’ve posted is either:
- Sourced directly from court documents
- Already publicly accessible
- Or expressed as opinion or commentary

This legal battle isn’t just about us. In our view, it's about everyone's right to speak openly, report on matters of public record, and express informed opinions without fear of retaliation.

We need your help to raise funds for legal representation against the Tate brothers.

Donate now. Share our story.

Stand with us.

Support Our Legal Defense

Traditional Donation

🙏 Donate via GiveSendGo Secure donation platform

Support with Crypto

Bitcoin QR
Ethereum QR
Solana QR

Download the Lawsuit

Google Drive View the lawsuit on Google Drive

How Tate Weaponizes Lawsuits

Case Updates

Update

Fighting Back Against Overreach

July 17th, 2025

We've formally objected to the plaintiffs' attempt to subpoena X (formerly Twitter) in order to obtain account information on multiple users, including both anonymous and named individuals. We believe this sets a dangerous precedent for online privacy, citizen journalism, and free speech.

Despite having 120 days to serve the defendants, the plaintiffs recently filed for an extension, admitting they hadn't served anyone during that time. We've objected to that extension as well.

This case isn't about truth or harm. We believe it's about exposure, intimidation, and silencing critics. Your support is helping us stand firm, protect our rights, and fight back through the proper legal channels.

Thank you for standing with us.

Update

We've raised $10,000 in just 10 days!

We're incredibly grateful for everyone standing with us as we defend ourselves against this frivolous lawsuit. Your support means everything.

Thank you.

Update

Judge assigned at Tates' request

May 17th, 2025

The court granted the Tate brothers' request to transfer the case to Division AI, where they specifically requested the Honorable Judge Curley, citing his involvement in two other related cases:

Tate v. Jane Doe

A defamation case against a US citizen (and her parents) identified by Romanian authorities as a trafficking victim.

Iasmina v. Gabby

A civil case between two of the Tate brothers' alleged trafficking victims.

Both cases are presided over by Judge Curley, and the same attorney representing the Tate brothers in this case, Thomas Maniotis, also represents Iasmina in hers against Gabby.

Judge Curley and attorney Thomas Maniotis are now involved in three related cases: this one, Tate v. Jane Doe, and Iasmina v. Gabby. This alignment of judge, attorney, and related parties could become increasingly relevant as the case moves forward.

Thank you for standing with us. We'll continue to keep you updated.